Common physics misconceptions
The Error Atlas
66 recurring reasoning mistakes. For each one: what it looks like, why it feels right, how to catch it, and the correct physics. Your diagnostic report links to the entries that match your answers.
Featured entries
Constant speed is not zero acceleration
detect · You set a = 0 for something moving in a curved path at steady speed.
Static friction is not always at its maximum
detect · You wrote f = μs·N for a body that isn't on the verge of slipping.
Centripetal acceleration points inward
detect · Your free-body diagram has a net outward arrow for something moving in a circle.
Full index
63 of 66 entries
Research basis
Where the taxonomy comes from.
The Atlas follows the physics-education-research tradition of treating a wrong answer as evidence of a specific alternative model, not carelessness. Several categories map to documented results:
- The phantom “force of motion” (NL-01) and impetus-style reasoningClement, Am. J. Phys. 50 (1982) · Halloun & Hestenes, Am. J. Phys. 53 (1985) · McCloskey, Scientific American 248 (1983)
- Velocity / acceleration confusion (the force–acceleration category)Trowbridge & McDermott, Am. J. Phys. 48 (1980) & 49 (1981)
- Distractors authored to detect specific misconceptions — the instrument design this diagnostic imitatesHestenes, Wells & Swackhamer, “Force Concept Inventory,” The Physics Teacher 30 (1992)
- Novices sorting problems by surface features instead of governing principles — why the ladder re-tests one principle in changing costumesChi, Feltovich & Glaser, Cognitive Science 5 (1981)
The entries, codes, and problems here are original. The method — coded distractors, named misconceptions, targeted repair — stands on this literature.